Eskimo Woe (2)
Eskimo Woe (3)
Eskimo Woe (4)
Eskimo Woe (5)
Eskimo Woe (6)
Eskimo Woe (7)
Eskimo Woe (8)
Eskimo Woe (9)
Eskimo Woe (10)
Eskimo Woe (11)
Eskimo Woe (12)
Eskimo Woe (13)
Eskimo Woe (14)
Eskimo Woe (15)
to be continued...
« Whilst the butterflies dance | Main | FAQ [literally 100% true] »
March 13, 2007
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Rudest doodle ever!
Posted by: Jack | March 13, 2007 at 06:29 PM
Not tonight darling, I've got a haddock.
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:30 PM
Bwahahaha!
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:30 PM
Honestly Andre, do stop CARPing on about sex.
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:32 PM
I bet she's thinking 'I'll be with you in a minnow, darling. No trout about that.'
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:33 PM
There goes my Christian fanbase
I do not think I should even think about posting Eskimo doodle 3 or 4 or 5?
Posted by: andre | March 13, 2007 at 06:33 PM
As cod is my unreliable witness, this is no plaice for that scale of roe emotion!
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:34 PM
You just know Mr Unreliable Witness has got a whole lot more fish jokes stored up his sleeve ;)
Posted by: qb | March 13, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Or maybe she's saying: 'Cod off, you weirdo.'
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Anyway, won't somebody fin of the children?
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:35 PM
He just wants to cop a quick eel, doesn't he?
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:37 PM
Anyway, these fish puns are too easy. You got me hook, line and sinker. But I'm not rising to the bait anymore.
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:38 PM
Surely if he's to take her up on her offer he'd have to mackerel wet first? Wouldn't want anyone to pull a mussel, eh?
Oh I give up, what's the porpoise?
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:39 PM
I have never received 12 comments so fast in all my life ... it seems sex doodles are want the average blogger really wants.
Posted by: andre | March 13, 2007 at 06:41 PM
It's not the sex that attracted us. It's the fish.
Mmm. Fish.
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 06:42 PM
You do seem to have touched some soles with this one.
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:42 PM
Fussy bitch, I am sorry to disappoint you - but the Eskimo on the right is a boy too ... all will be [might be] revealed in Eskimo doodle 3
Posted by: andre | March 13, 2007 at 06:43 PM
Oh Andre, you're a ray of light in my gloomy cray little world.
Posted by: Jack | March 13, 2007 at 06:47 PM
I knew that but the mackerel pun was just too good not to use (well, in my head it was so YOU SHUT UP!)
I simply must leave the house for a couple of hours, please feel free to take your time with doodle 3!
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 13, 2007 at 06:47 PM
I really am not sure about Eskimo doodle 3 ... I think I may have to draw something else.
[and God is always watching over us]
Posted by: andre | March 13, 2007 at 06:51 PM
I am. And you're going to hell, Jordan.
Posted by: God | March 13, 2007 at 06:52 PM
Forgive me Father for I have sinned. I performed 734 unnecessary knighthoods last week.
Posted by: Queen Elizabeth II | March 13, 2007 at 06:54 PM
Who was that long-haired foppish doodler you had down on his knees in front of you last week/
Posted by: Prince Philip | March 13, 2007 at 07:06 PM
I am disgusted!
Posted by: Cheerful One | March 13, 2007 at 07:13 PM
I, too, am disgusted.
More please.
Posted by: Salvadore Vincent | March 13, 2007 at 07:17 PM
I am not disgusted. Or surprised. This site has long been nothing but pure, unbridled FILTH of the highest order. With eskimos rubbing noses.
Posted by: An Unreliable Witness | March 13, 2007 at 07:20 PM
I seem to have misjudged the popularity of filthy smut?
Plus also I really should have done the Eskimo doodles in one long post as I plan to do a series of hardcore leprechaun doodles next.
Posted by: andre | March 13, 2007 at 07:27 PM
Erm...snapper.
Posted by: just a girl | March 13, 2007 at 08:46 PM
oh my goodness andre! there's no hidden message or subtleness about this post! it's amazing!!! kisseskisseskisses ^*^
Posted by: Rachel | March 13, 2007 at 10:54 PM
This strikes me as perhaps being a bit less woeful than the first one.
Posted by: Katy Newton | March 14, 2007 at 12:14 AM
oh yes, less woeful.
I am struggling to even look at it now.
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 12:26 AM
Well, slap me in the face with a wet kipper! I wish I was an eskimo fucker with fur around my hair...
Posted by: Ariel | March 14, 2007 at 02:19 AM
There's something fishy going on here.
Posted by: day in bed | March 14, 2007 at 04:54 AM
I like the black speech bubbles with the white writing, by the way. Practical, because otherwise the Eskimos wouldn't be able to see each other's speech bubbles against the snow, yet also pretty.
Posted by: Katy Newton | March 14, 2007 at 08:52 AM
I have painted a vulgar picture haven't I?
I feel quite ashamed.
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 09:57 AM
What nonsense! But if it makes you feel better you could always change the f word to the k word.
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 14, 2007 at 10:22 AM
can you Kuck a fish?
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 10:28 AM
Is loneliness really solved by intercourse? I myself had the sex very recently but still feel lonely.
Am I perhaps taking this a little too seriously?
Posted by: flunt | March 14, 2007 at 10:33 AM
Grr
(not you, flunt)
(Er, recently? Grr at you too then)
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 14, 2007 at 10:35 AM
Oh, the rejection! Fish can't dance the conger wearing eels and fishnet stockings when things get a bit dull, can they?
Posted by: Fussy Bitch | March 14, 2007 at 12:52 PM
Woohahaha, I love them all! Especially the way the follow ups were posted. Is a number 5 on it's way?
Posted by: Cecile Weekly | March 14, 2007 at 04:08 PM
Stop it. Now. You heartless bastard.
Or we'll sue.
Posted by: RSPF (Royal Society for the Protection of Fish) | March 14, 2007 at 05:00 PM
Hello RSPF, I shall stop it now.
Are Killer whales classed as fish?
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 05:05 PM
No, we are not. So get your grubby mitts (ahem) off me.
Posted by: A killer whale | March 14, 2007 at 05:15 PM
Bugger!
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 05:34 PM
Your little eskimo men look like Penis Heads. Intentional?
Posted by: BOSSY | March 14, 2007 at 05:42 PM
what kind of a penis have you got!!!!
Posted by: andre | March 14, 2007 at 05:48 PM
Didn't the other Eskimo want a go at his icehole then?
Posted by: Robin B | March 14, 2007 at 08:32 PM
the "here fishy fishy" bit is brilliant
Posted by: summerofb | March 14, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Too cute!
A bit disgusting and off topic, but I recently heard whale sperm (no, not sperm whales) is a delicacy in Japan.
0_o
Posted by: Joy | March 15, 2007 at 06:21 PM